newspaper article provided here was included in a newpaper
called The Planet and published February 1986 in the
Washington, D.C.. It was delivered to every member of the U.S.
House of Representatives and every member of the United States
Senate. Not one representative, senator or staff assistant was
motiviated sufficiently to investigate further.
The newspaper was also provided free to the George Washington
University Medical School students and professors. Again, not
one was motivated to investigate further. All while 7,000 to
10,000 Americans died weekly from cancer!
Good examples of public irresponsibility from people in
positions of public trust or professions with public trust
September 25, 1999
Cancer Cure That Worked: The Rife Report was published in
April 1987, 14 months after the U.S. Congress turned its back on
Rife and ignored an incredible opportunity to "jump
start" the Rife revival.
Planet The cure for cancer was
Treatment suppressed since 1930s
Reprinted with permission from Barry Lynes
has been a secret for many years --more than 50 years in
fact. It is a secret that is a shame of the medical profession
and another example of complacent press, another example of a
scientific conspiracy that resembles more a medieval guild
protecting its financial interests than a profession dedicated
to public service, and another example of a political system
afraid to promote the public good when it clashed with powerful
story also demonstrates how apathetic, asleep, cowardly and
unwilling so many individuals, especially the self-righteous
"new agers," actually are when given the opportunity
to take real initiatives which could rectify monstrous wrongs.
secret is the cancer cure.
detailing this fundamental wrong, it is important to emphasize
what 50 years of covering up a cancer cure has meant in
terms of suffering. Almost every family in America has been
touched by the horror of lingering deaths by cancer. Those who
haven't been directly affected have known neighbors and friends
who have been the victims of both the disease and the arrogant
scientists, government bureaucrats and financial elites who are
responsible. Children have been among the many millions who have
not only been abandoned to cancer's excruciating pain and
protracted terror, but to existing, stupid, torturous,
experimental procedures which don't work. In a word, the
American medical and political "establishment" are
guilty of gross misconduct.
nation is premised upon democratic procedures, checks and
balances, competition, and the correction of abuses through open
discussion which lead to institutional change. In the matter of
this 50 year old cancer cure, all of the above have not
worked. The cancer cure was suppressed. Agencies, both public
and private, were not responsive. The cost in human lives and
wasted resources has been staggering. A Vietnam War, the
countless annual deaths in automobile accidents, or' the lives
prematurely ended because of inferior nutrution caused by
poverty together cannot match the number who have died horribly
because America's culture could not expose and then break the
vested interests which perpetrated this crime. And if Colorado
Governor Lamm's figures are correct, one-third of
Americans now living will die of cancer in the future. Americans
tion of committed scientitst, and to promote the needed public
education. So perhaps finally -~ if enough of us insist on it --
America's institutional ability to correct this outrage can be
demonstrated. But don't hold your breath. Without a major,
on-going, public commitment and a national authority to oversee
the effort and report regularly on the progress being. made, it
is unlikely that swift, significant remedies will occur.
another article in this issue (The Timid Press, Page 1),
syndicated columnist Mary McGrory's acceptance speech upon
receiving the Lovejoy journalism award is reported. In that
talk, Ms. McGrory advocated that readers read their papers
"with the idea of doing something." In a similar vein,
the article on the changing weather and the scientific cover up
involved, science philosopher Paul Feyerabend is quoted when he
calls for "duly elected committees of laymen" to judge
the efforts and recommendations of scientists.
if anything deserves both the individual reader's commitment as
well as participation in oversight committees, it is the
investigation into this cancer cure and the development of
procedures to bring this cancer cure into practical use as fast
story is somewhat technical, but the complicated scientific
details will be omitted in order that you, the reader, can grasp
the essentials. The specifics can be checked elsewhere and it is
hoped that enough of you --including experts capable of
initiating action will do so. A mobilization is required, for
not only cancer. but AIDS and many other
diseases threatening us are potentially capable of being
eradicated if we, the people of the United States, get off our
the 1920s a scientist-inventor named Royal Raymond Rife invented
a new kind of microscope. In an article New Age Journal March
produced little from New readers), the story of Rife's
cancer cure was detailed. Since then, Rife has been nominated
for the "Alternative Nobel Prize" which is annually
awarded in Europe as a protest to the more established, less
risk taking Swedish honor. Yet, little notice of Rife and his
miraculous discovery has infiltrated the establishment m
microscope was a stunning advance. Unlike the electron
microscope, Rife's microscope made it possible to study
"living" bacteria, viruses, and so forth. An electron
microscope kills its specimens. Rife's remarkable breakthrough
used a new approach to bend light. As a result, Rife was able to
prove that bacteria could change their form. In effect, they
could become cancer causing viruses.
then implanted his cancer-causing bacteria into rats. Tumors
subsequently developed. From here, Rife made the startling
discovery that the bacteria could change into a completely
different form if the "medium on which they were
living" was slightly altered. In other words, Rife's cancer
causing substance was, in some forms and in association with
some environments within the body, deadly. But in other
forms and in other environments, benign. His cancer causing
substance could be changed back and forth from one to the other.
The implications of this discovery are obvious. Cancer cells
might be transformed to healthy cells again!
then began beaming different frequencies of light on these
microorganisms. Up until the early 1950s, Rife perfected
this method. As Christopher Bird reported in the New Age article,
"many lethal those of tuberculosis, typhoid, leprosy . . .
appeared to disintegrate or 'bIow up' in the field of his
microscope." This "death ray" was applied to
cancers in rats. It worked!
next step was humans. The result? Here is Rife's report:
"The first clinical work on cancer was completed under the
supervision of Milbank Johnson, M.D., which was setup under a
special medical research committee of the University of Southern
California. Sixteen cases were treated at the clinic for manv
tvpes of malignancy. After three months, fourteen of these
so-called hopeless cases were signed off as clinically cured by
a staff of medical doctors and Alvin G. Foord, M. D.,
pathologist for the group.
the 1930's, Rife and associates continued their work. In 1940,
Arthur W. Yale, M.D. reported that Rife's discoveries were an
entirely new theory of the origin and cause of cancer, and the
treatment and results have been so unique and unbelievable"
that we' may be able to "eliminate the second largest cause
of deaths in the United States."
it was not to be!
were powerful doctors whose careers were based on the theory
that bacteria could not change its form. Rife's discovery
threatened their status and their own research. (It was like the
invention of the automobile for a horse-drawn carriage driver.)
of these "authorities" was Dr. Thomas Rivers of the
Rockefeller Institute. Another was Harvard microbiologist Dr.
Hans Zinsser. The cancer cure was killed by the powerful.
of Rife's supporters, Dr. Edward C. Rosenow, a pioneer
bacteriologist, sadly commented at the end of his life,
"They simply won't listen."
have followed Rife and have confirmed different aspects of his
theory, but since they are few in number and are promoting a
cause contrary to the medical establishment's approved
philosophy, they are not supported. Even publishing their
findings is difficult if not impossible because of the dominant
medical orthodoxy which has reigned since the 1930s!
Bird's 1976' New Age Journal article contained a,
summation of the political coverup as perceived by the
Lee Foundation of Nutritional Research in Milwaukee. According
to Bird, the Lee Foundation "maintains that Rife, his
microscope and his life work were tabooed by Ieaders in the U.S.
medical profession and that any medical doctor who made use of
his practical discoveries was stripped of his privileges as a
member of the local medical society."
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) still bans treatments similar
to those of Rife.
how many millions of dollars are annually "invested"
in the establishment's preferred quackery and toururous
interested in pursuing this matter, which as a first step means
forming a national committee of scientists, administrators,
"can-do-types" and laymen to monitor and correct this
crime are encouraged to contact The Planet. Perhaps
citizen action is not entirely dead in this country yet.
have we truly lost our nerve, our fighting spirit, and our 1776
contempt for aristrocracy assuming dictatorial rights over our
bodies and minds?